Stay Out of the Mud
Iran hung over Israel, the United States, and much of the Arab world like an albatross for nearly half a century following the Islamic Revolution of 1979. During those decades, successive American presidents promised to contain the regime, restrain its ambitions, or reform its behavior. None succeeded.
Instead, the ayatollahs grew steadily bolder. They financed
and armed terror proxies across the Middle East, spread terror and instability
through Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis, threatened shipping lanes and oil
supplies, and relentlessly advanced toward nuclear capability. As time went on,
Iran entrenched itself even further.
For years, Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu warned
the world about Iran and the danger it represented. Most Western leaders
treated his warnings with discomfort or irritation. Barack Obama openly
despised him and viewed Netanyahu as an obstacle to diplomacy. Joe Biden was
similarly distrustful of him and his confrontational approach.
The first American president willing to embrace Netanyahu’s
view of Iran was Donald Trump. Together with Israel, the United States
eventually crossed a line previous administrations feared to cross, striking
Iranian nuclear facilities during last year’s 12-Day War. More recently, they
undertook a joint operation to degrade Iran and permanently remove the threat
it represented.
Iran suffered devastating blows. Military infrastructure was
damaged. The Ayatollah Supreme Leader and senior commanders were eliminated.
Yet, authoritarian regimes possess a grim advantage over democracies: They can
absorb enormous suffering without changing course. Tyrannies do not answer to
public exhaustion, economic pain, or mounting casualties in the same way
elected governments do. So regardless of how hard they are hit and how much
they suffer, they absorb the blows and continue forward.
The military success exposed an older and more difficult
problem: It is relatively easy to begin a war. The hard part is ending it.
Democracies grow weary quickly. Citizens expect results,
timelines, and exits. They measure wars in news cycles and election seasons.
Dictatorships measure them in generations.
That is the dilemma now confronting Trump and Netanyahu.
Bombing campaigns can weaken a regime, but unless the regime collapses or
surrenders completely, the question becomes: What comes next?
Trump wants to be remembered not as a wartime president
trapped in another endless Middle Eastern conflict, but as a dealmaker and
peacemaker. Ceasefires are declared, promises are extracted, negotiations
resume, and the cycle begins again.
Trump no longer allows Netanyahu to lead him. He wants a way
out, and Netanyahu does not appear to have one. Trump declared a ceasefire many
weeks ago. Iran promised to keep the Strait of Hormuz open and negotiate an end
to its nuclear ambitions. Neither has happened, and now a new deal is being
negotiated that allows the tyrants to remain in power while once again
accepting their word regarding keeping the strait open and negotiating an end
to their nuclear program.
And perhaps that is the larger lesson.
Human beings often rush into conflicts, relationships,
policies, and wars driven by emotion, instinct, or necessity, without seriously
considering how they will conclude if events do not unfold according to plan.
Beginning something is easy. Ending it wisely is much harder.
Children grab for toys without thinking beyond the moment.
They see a toy and want to play with it. If another child has it or wants it
and resists, the struggle escalates instinctively. Neither child can yet speak,
so they grab and fight.
Maturity means developing the ability to see beyond the
immediate impulse, to anticipate consequences, to understand limits, and to
recognize that force alone rarely resolves complex struggles.
Growing up means learning to live with insight instead of
inclination.
Not every adult fully learns that lesson.
Some people move through life reacting emotionally to every
frustration, temptation, and provocation. They begin conflicts without
considering how difficult they may be to end. They make decisions based on
momentary feelings instead of long-term consequences.
People often rush into things emotionally, impulsively, or
reactively, without considering the consequences, the endings, the costs, or
whether they even have a plan.
Nations are often not much different.
Military campaigns can begin with dramatic speeches and
decisive action. But once events fail to unfold according to plan, leaders
suddenly discover that there is no simple exit. Democracies grow impatient. New
leaders replace old ones. Temporary victories create new complications;
overwhelming power cannot always produce a clean or permanent solution.
And so the world finds itself trapped in cycles that nobody
fully thought through from the beginning.
But this problem is not limited to governments and wars.
In truth, people do this every day in their private lives.
A person says something sharp in anger without thinking
where the argument will lead. Someone makes a reckless purchase without
considering the consequences.
Human beings are often captivated by the immediate moment.
We want something, so we reach for it. We are hurt, so we strike back. We are
angry, so we react.
But mature thinking involves the ability to pause and ask
not only, “What do I want right now?” but also, “Where will this lead?”
Wisdom is not merely the ability to act. It is the ability
to think ahead.
Before speaking, before fighting, before committing, before
reacting, before investing time, money, or prestige into a project, a person
must ask himself: What happens if this does not work out? Where will this step
that I am taking lead me? And what will this decision demand of me tomorrow,
next month, or years from now?
Anyone can start something. Intelligence and maturity mean
understanding the cost of finishing it, and sometimes not getting involved in
the first place.
The Brisker Rov would illustrate this idea with a moshol
about a young baal agalah whose wagon veered off the road and became
stuck in thick mud.
The driver strained with all his might to free the wagon. He
whipped his poor horses repeatedly, pushed at the wheels, and tried every trick
he knew, but the wagon only sank deeper. Exhausted and frustrated, he realized
that he had no choice but to trudge into town to seek advice from the veteran
wagon drivers gathered at the local inn.
Spotting one baal agalah who looked particularly
seasoned and wise, the young man approached him and poured out his troubles.
“I’ve tried everything,” he said desperately. “Nothing
works. Tell me, how do I get out of this mess?”
The older driver listened quietly and then replied: “My dear
friend, you are right. Once a wagon sinks that deeply into the mud, it is
impossible to get out. But an experienced baal agalah knows that the
real wisdom is not in figuring out how to escape the mud afterward, it is
knowing how not to get stuck in it.”
That lesson applies not only to wagon drivers, but to
nations and individuals as well.
For decades, the world allowed Iran to become entrenched,
believing that somehow the problem could always be managed later through
diplomacy, sanctions, threats, or limited military action. Now leaders across
the world are struggling to answer a question that should have been asked long
ago: How do you get out of a situation that was permitted to grow unchecked for
nearly half a century?
But the lesson is not only about Iran. It is about us.
In life, people often act first and think later. They speak
in anger and only afterward wonder how to repair the damage. They enter
conflicts, commitments, and situations without considering where they may lead.
Emotion and impulse overpower judgment and foresight.
The wise person tries to think several steps ahead before
acting.
Anyone can charge ahead impulsively. Wisdom lies in seeing
the mud before the wagon sinks into it.
Chazal reinforce this lesson in this week’s parsha.
Rashi (6:2), quoting the Gemara (Sotah 2a), asks why the parsha
of nozir immediately follows the parsha of sotah. He
explains, “Loma nismicha parshas nozir l’parshas sotah, lomar loch shekol
haroeh sotah b’kilkulah yazir atzmo min hayayin — Whoever sees a sotah
in her disgrace should forbid himself from drinking wine.”
At first glance, the lesson seems difficult to understand.
The person we are referring to has just witnessed the terrible consequences of
sin. He has seen humiliation, pain, and destruction. We would think that the
experience would strengthen his resolve never to sin.
Yet, Chazal understood human nature differently.
Being exposed to sin, even while witnessing its
consequences, can weaken a person’s natural revulsion toward aveirah.
The very exposure creates familiarity. The boundaries become less absolute.
What once seemed unthinkable slowly becomes imaginable.
Therefore, the Torah says that someone who witnessed the sotah
in her disgrace must take protective action. He must reinforce himself before
temptation arrives. He must become a nozir and distance himself from
wine so that he will not be led to spiritual failure. Transgressing an aveirah
begins with small compromises, lowered defenses, and the mistaken belief that
“it could never happen to me.”
That is the deeper lesson the Torah is teaching.
A wise person does not merely react once he is trapped in
the mud. He thinks ahead and protects himself before reaching dangerous ground.
And if this is true regarding a sotah, where the
person who committed the aveirah is disgraced and suffering the
consequences, how much more so must a person be careful when surrounded by
sinners who appear successful, happy, and carefree. When an aveirah is
packaged attractively, when wrongdoing appears glamorous or rewarding, the
danger becomes far greater.
The Torah therefore teaches us that a person must always
think several steps ahead. We must know where certain roads lead, even when the
beginning appears harmless or pleasurable. We must understand that aveirah
always leads to kilkul.
Similarly, Chazal teach us in Pirkei Avos, “Hevei
mechasheiv hefsed mitzvah keneged sechorah, usechar aveirah keneged hefseidah.”
When it feels difficult or costly to do a mitzvah, Chazal
recommend thinking about the eternal reward it brings and recognizing that the
temporary sacrifice is insignificant compared to the everlasting gain. And when
an aveirah appears profitable, enjoyable, or enticing, think ahead to
the spiritual damage, the loss, and the consequences it will inevitably bring.
The Torah is teaching us to live not by impulse, but by
thought.
Sinners and fools live only in the moment, swept along by
temptation, emotion, and desire. Bnei Torah are meant to live
differently. A ben Torah thinks before he acts. He looks beyond the
excitement of the moment and considers where a path ultimately leads before
taking the first step down the road.
And no person should imagine themself immune to influence.
People often assume that they can read whatever they wish,
expose themselves to questionable ideas and lifestyles, and remain untouched by
them. They convince themselves that seeing improper behavior, hearing distorted
attitudes, or consuming foolishness — and worse — will not affect their
thinking or weaken their values.
But the Torah teaches otherwise.
Chazal understood that exposure itself changes a
person. What once shocked him slowly becomes normal. What was unacceptable
gradually loses its ugliness. The yeitzer hora rarely succeeds through
sudden collapse. It works slowly, eroding sensitivities little by little until
a person no longer recognizes how far he has drifted.
When the Second World War ended, many of the refugees of the
Mir Yeshiva who had survived the war years in Shanghai emigrated to the United
States. Among them was the great mashgiach, Rav Yechezkel Levenstein.
Yet, he found himself unable to remain here for long.
He explained that when he first arrived in America, the
sight of public chillul Shabbos horrified him. Seeing cars driving on Shabbos
caused him deep pain. But as time passed, he noticed that he was becoming
accustomed to it. The shock was fading. That realization frightened him so
deeply that he left America and moved to Eretz Yisroel.
Today, many of us are fortunate to live in neighborhoods
where Shabbos is publicly honored and cherished. The streets are quiet,
the stores are closed, and the atmosphere itself reflects kedushas Shabbos.
But no person should believe that he is beyond influence. Even if our streets
are sheltered, our minds and hearts are constantly exposed to a world filled
with temptations, distractions, and values profoundly at odds with Torah.
The lesson of the nozir is as relevant today as ever.
We must think ahead. We must protect ourselves before the struggle begins. We
must recognize which influences strengthen us and which slowly weaken us, even
when the damage is not immediately visible.
After having just experienced the beautiful Yom Tov
of Shavuos, we should carry this message with us. “Loma nismicha chag
Shavuos l’parshas nozir.” At Har Sinai, on Shavuos, we were given a
way of life through the Torah that teaches us to live thoughtfully, carefully,
and deliberately. We need to ask ourselves where what we are doing will lead,
what type of person it will make us, and whether it will bring us closer to Hashem
or further away.
The world often glorifies spontaneity and living for the
moment. Torah teaches responsibility, foresight, and self-awareness. It teaches
us to see the mud before the wagon sinks into it. It teaches us to be a mamleches
kohanim v’goy kadosh.
May we all merit living lives of Torah and mitzvos
and merit the coming of Moshiach very soon.
