Let’s Get Along
Rabbi
Pinchos Lipschutz
This
week, in Parshas Shelach, we study the tragic episode of the meraglim
sent by Moshe to spy on the land of Eretz Yisroel. The Jews wanted to send
spies to the Promised Land to ascertain whether it would be difficult to take
it over. Moshe acquiesced and chose twelve leaders of Klal Yisroel for
the mission, one from each tribe. Ten of those men went on to err terribly. The
Jews were severely punished for the actions and words of the errant messengers,
and though there was a certain measure of forgiveness, we have suffered
throughout the ages because of the incident.
There
are many timeless lessons embedded in the story.
We
wonder how messengers of Moshe Rabbeinu could have made such a terrible
mistake. And, assuming that the meraglim were misled because of some
personal negiah, how does that explain their ability to convince virtually
the entire nation that they would never make it to the Promised Land?
How
was it that the people who experienced Yetzias Mitzrayim and Kriyas
Yam Suf lost their faith in the G-d who promised them that He would care
for them and lead them to the land that had been promised to their forefathers
and about which they had heard ever since they were born?
The
first Rashi in the parsha holds the key to understanding this
enigma. Quoting from the Medrash Tanchuma, Rashi explains that
“the parsha of the meraglim follows the parsha of Miriam,
because although these wicked people saw that Miriam was punished for speaking
gossip about her brother, they failed to learn any lesson from it.”
The
common explanation of Rashi is that witnessing the painful consequences
of Miriam’s lashon hora should have deterred the meraglim from
speaking lashon hora about the Land of Israel. How, many commentators
ask, can one extrapolate from Miriam’s episode that speaking ill of a country
is as sinful as speaking ill of a person?
Perhaps
we can understand this by examining the root of lashon hora, commonly
understood as gossip. The roots of this sin, however, are far more destructive
than gossip.
At
the end of Parshas Beha’aloscha (12:1-2), the posuk states that
“Miriam and Aharon spoke about Moshe concerning his wife. And they said, ‘Did
Hashem only speak to Moshe? He also spoke to us!’” The posuk does not
tell us what Miriam and Aharon said about Moshe’s wife, but it does say that
they minimized their brother’s greatness. They compared themselves to Moshe, as
if to say, “Who does he think he is? Hashem doesn’t only talk to him. He speaks
to us as well.”
In
fact, it seems that what lies at the essence of lashon hora is an intent
to minimize the accomplishments of other people. People admire someone for
being special or having accomplished something good, and one fellow will come
by and throw a damper on it by saying, “What makes you think he’s so great?
He’s really no different than you and me. He also has failings. Don’t be taken in.
Don’t think that what he did is so exceptional.”
These
kinds of disparaging remarks serve to lower public esteem for the victim.
Remarks such as these also discourage people from engaging in good deeds by
casting those deeds as insincere or politically motivated.
A mesaper
lashon hora cools off people’s enthusiasm for a fellow Jew by casting
aspersions on his motives and downplaying his accomplishments.
Such
people seek to wreck the reputation of anyone good, if only to justify their
own incompetence and lack of accomplishments.
The meraglim
should have learned from Miriam what happens to someone who disparages and
minimizes greatness. They failed to learn that negativity and cynicism are not
compatible with greatness. They should have seen that such activity is frowned
upon by Hashem, for even if the facts are true, talk that serves to diminish
the subject’s esteem is lashon hora.
At
the root of lashon hora is a desire to destroy the respect people have
for someone or something else.
At
times, lashon hora is an attempt to devastate a relationship, as, for
example, when a person tells someone else that his friend acted in a way that
is detrimental to the other party’s interests. The intention - and effect - is
to drive a wedge between the two people.
When
two people engage in conversation and one begins to speak negatively about
someone else, the person he is speaking to feels comfortable piling on more
negative stuff about the victim. Had the baal lashon hora not come
along, he might have continued believing that his friend was beyond reproach,
but thanks to the belittling remarks from the person who initiated the
conversation, the victim has been knocked down from the high pedestal upon
which he formerly stood. The second fellow now feels comfortable chiming in
with deprecating remarks of his own.
Thus
begins the chain of evil that is at the root of the churban Bais Hamikdosh
and the reason we have not yet merited to be redeemed.
[The
Gemara in Yoma (9b) states that the second Bais Hamikdosh
was destroyed because of sinas chinom, commonly translated as
unwarranted hatred. The Gemara cites as an example of sinas chinom
people who ate and drank together and acted friendly towards each other and
then stabbed each other with the daggers of their tongues.
Rav
Yisroel Meir Hakohein, in his introduction to Chofetz Chaim, writes that
this refers to lashon hara. It is thus evident that sinas chinom
and lashon hora both have at their core a baseless jealousy and hatred
that seek to separate people from each other and negate their positive
attributes. Both ills have the same outcome and lead to divisiveness and churban.]
If
you read the first Rashi in Parshas Shelach carefully, you should
have a question. You will notice that Rashi refers to the episode of
Miriam and Aharon talking ill of Moshe as “the parsha of Miriam.”
Shouldn’t it be called “the parsha of Miriam and Aharon”? The pesukim
in Parshas Beha’aloscha (12:1-2) state that both of them spoke ill of
Moshe: “Vatedabeir Miriam v’Aharon b’Moshe… Vayomru…” Why, then, is it
referred to as the parsha of Miriam?
Rashi (ibid.) says that Miriam’s
name is quoted in the posuk prior to that of Aharon because she was the
one who initiated the conversation.
Perhaps,
since the root of lashon hora is that it seeks to minimize the
accomplishments and positive attributes of another person, the one who began
the conversation is the key perpetrator, since he or she is the one who opened
the door to a negative portrayal of the person.
Therefore,
it is referred to as the parsha of Miriam and the Torah relates that
Miriam was punished, and it does not discuss whether Aharon was also held
accountable for the words expressed in that conversation. Aharon and Miriam
were tzaddikim on a high level of avodah and it is not for us to
criticize them or their speech or actions.
It
should be noted that the Torah relates what took place only in order for us to
learn from the episode to avoid the temptations to minimize others.
Everything
that takes place in this world should serve as a lesson for us how to conduct
ourselves. The meraglim paid no heed to the whole parsha that
transpired with Miriam and her very public punishment. They are therefore
referred to by Rashi as resho’im, wicked people: “v’resho’im
hallalu ra’u velo lokchu mussar.” People who aren’t on the lookout to
improve themselves by analyzing the world around them are not just not good.
They are wicked.
The
downfall of the meraglim was their failure to learn this lesson not to
belittle and disparage. They badmouthed the Land of Israel, which Hashem had
praised. They said that it was an “eretz ocheles yoshveha,” a
land that eats its citizens. Then they said that the people who live there are
very strong and would cause problems for the Jews upon their entry into the
land. They said that the fruits there were too large for people to carry home
and eat.
They
minimized the greatness of the Land and the promises of Hashem. They drove a
wedge between Moshe and Am Yisroel. They caused the nation to have
doubts about the greatness of Hashem and whether He could bring the Chosen
People to the land of milk and honey He had promised them since the days of the
avos.
For
all eternity, these individuals will be referred to as resho’im.
Such
acts are similar to the acts of Amaleik, a nation held up as a paradigm of evil
because, as the posuk relates, “asher korcha baderech,” they
caused the Jews to lose their enthusiasm on the way to Eretz Yisroel. After Matan
Torah, when the nations of the world saw the splendor of Hashem and feared
Him, Amaleik attacked us. Amaleik tried to dissipate the fear of Hashem that
had spread across the world. They tried to show that Hashem could not really
protect the Jewish people.
Their
crime emanated from the same root as the crime of lashon hora, and thus
they both cause churban.
To
reinforce the concept that lashon hora and Amaleik are rooted in the
same shoresh of evil, perhaps we can cite the Gemara in Maseches
Megillah (13b), which quotes Rava as saying that there was no one who knew
[how to speak] lashon hora as Haman did. This arch villain minimized to
Achashveirosh every positive attribute the Jews possessed. As is well-known,
Haman was a progeny of Amaleik and was well-versed in that evil nation’s ways.
Haman
said that the Jewish people are “mefuzar umeforad bein ha’amim.” He
sought to bring out that the Jews lacked unity.
Another
indication of this idea is evident in the peirush of Rabbeinu Bachya on Chumash.
In Parshas Shemos (2:13-14), the Torah relates the first episode
involving Moshe and Doson v’Avirom. Moshe saw the two of them fighting and said
to them, “Rasha lomo sakeh reiyecha.” To which they responded, “Who made
you for an ish, minister and ruler above us? Will you kill me the way
you killed the Mitzri?”
Moshe
Rabbeinu responded by saying, “Now the matter is known.” Rashi cites the
Medrash, which explains the statement to mean that now Moshe understood
why the Jews deserved to be enslaved. Rabbeinu Bachya, quoting the Medrash,
takes it a step further and says that the reason they were in Mitzrayim and not
yet redeemed was because they had amongst them baalei lashon hora.
But
they had not told lashon hora. They did not tell anyone that Moshe
killed a Mitzri. They simply let Moshe know that they had witnessed what
he did. Why does the Medrash refer to that as lashon hora?
It
may be that Moshe Rabbeinu’s comment was going on their statement questioning
Moshe’s standing: “Mi somcha l’ish…” It was their attempt to minimize him
and his greatness to which Moshe was referring when he said that the reason
they were still in Mitzrayim was because of lashon hora. Bittul
is a cause of golus and impedes geulah. They said to Moshe, “Mi
somcha l’ish? Who do you think you are? Who gave you power to lord over
us?” They minimized the person who had come to help the Jewish people. That
is lashon hora.
Lashon
hora is
compatible with destruction, for that is ultimately what it leads to - churban.
Constant bittul leads to churban. As long as we are divided among
ourselves and cynical of each other, we cannot live in peace with one another
or with anyone else. We are mefuzar umeforad bein ha’amim as long as
there is peirud between us, and there is nothing that causes peirud
as does lashon hora.
To
affect peirud and assuage our feelings of guilt and inadequacy, the yeitzer
hora causes us to cast doubt on others’ accomplishments and good deeds on
our behalf. Instead of returning the favor, we begin to develop a dislike for
them.
When
we see people take public stands on issues facing our people, and when we see
people rise to assist the downtrodden, the abused, the poor, and tzaddikim
or talmidei chachomim in need of assistance, some are quick to attach
impure motives to their acts of tzedakah and chesed. We do that
to calm our pangs of guilt. We sit by and do next to nothing. We do that
because Amaleik has not yet been totally destroyed and some of his poison is
still around, infecting us.
The
sin of the meraglim’s lashon hora caused the Jews to wander in
the desert for forty years. Our chato’im of lashon hora have
caused us to wander even longer. Let us all be more careful about how we speak.
Let us seek to look at our friends and people we come in contact with b’ayin
tovah. Let us try to attach laudatory motives to people who rise to aid the
community.
There
was a time when we could disagree without seeking to destroy each other. The
golden Jewish ideal of achdus means that we can disagree on legitimate
matters of fact, or philosophy, or hashkofah, yet remain friends. There
is no reason for radicals or pacifists to hate each other. They can have
different perspectives on the world, yet argue amicably and peacefully. The
rancor that is all too prevalent in our world is not only senseless and needless,
but destroys us and keeps us enslaved in golus.
What
excuse do we, who see what happened to Miriam, who see what happened to the meraglim,
and who have studied Torah from great rabbeim, have to be cynical and
negative? What excuse do we have to mock others and engage in public battles?
What excuse do we have not to follow in the path of Torah, whose path is that
of calmness and peace - “derocheha darchei noam vechol nesivoseha shalom”?
Just
because others rip each other apart and seek to destroy opponents doesn’t mean
that we should adopt their ways. Just because politicians perfect the science
of destroying people they don’t like does not mean that it is the way for bnei
Avrohom, Yitzchok and Yaakov to deal with people. Just because there is a
business known as “opposition research” in which people sit all day and look
for lashon hora they can fling on people they don’t like, or whom they
disagree with, does not mean that it is something we should do.
We
have enough enemies who seek to undermine and destroy us. We shouldn’t be doing
that to each other. Look at the election campaign now going on in Eretz Yisroel
and see how parties seek to win the premiership by promising to destroy the frum
community. It is not a time to be petty and myopic. It is a time to lock arms
and see what needs to be done to turn around their evil plans.
Now
is not the time for lashon hora and machlokes. Actually, it never
is.
Look
at the incendiary plans of the left in the United States and ponder what will
happen if they make more gains in 2020. Perhaps the right is not perfect, but
they sure are better for us and our interests than the left.
Iran
seeks to battle Israel and America. Think when reading the news and realize
that eis tzorah hee l’Yaakov. It is a time of real danger for the Jewish
people. Our reaction when observing a $100 million American drone knocked out
of the sky should not be to mock and question the president, but to pray that
he is granted the wisdom and courage to act correctly in turbulent times. Our
reaction should be to seek achdus among our brothers, along with kedusha
and maasim tovim.
Let
us get to work so that we can merit the rebuilding of the Bais Hamikdosh
and the geulah sheleimah bimeheirah.