Humble Redemption
One beautiful spring day, a chossid of the Chiddushei Harim is said to have come to the rebbe complaining that he was depressed. “Rebbe,” he cried, “the parshiyos the past few weeks have been too much for me to bear. One week we read about the misonenim, the complainers. Then we learn about the meraglim. Then we read about Korach and his followers. Rebbe, I can’t take it all. It’s so disheartening.”
Week after week, we read of the
challenges facing a new nation struggling to come to terms with the reality of
its own existence. We read the stories, we study them, and we wonder how people
who were so smart, so gifted and so blessed, and who had witnessed and
experienced unprecedented miracles and salvation, had strayed so far off
course.
In fact, it is a mark of heightened
spiritual sensitivity for our moods to be influenced by the weekly parsha.
However, even those of us not on that level perceive that there is a common
theme running through these tragic parshiyos.
Since there is an obvious connection
between the stories, Chazal wonder about the placement of the account of
the meraglim in this week’s parsha of Shelach. They ask.
what the tale of spies dispatched to tour and report on the most splendid
country on earth has to do with the story at the end of last week’s parsha pertaining
to Miriam?
Parshas Beha’aloscha ended with the story of Miriam, who was punished for
speaking ill of her brother, Moshe Rabbeinu.
Chazal explain the connection between the two stories as follows:
“Reshoim halalu ra’u velo lokchu mussar - The wicked ones saw what
happened to Miriam and didn’t learn a lesson from it” (Rashi, Bamidbar
13:2, quoting the Tanchumah).
On a simple level, the lesson they
should have learned from Miriam’s experience relates to the aveirah of lashon
hara. Miriam was punished for speaking negatively about her brother. The meraglim
were unaffected by her punishment and spoke lashon hara about the land.
Upon further examination of the two
parshiyos, another pattern emerges, adding a deeper dimension to the
connection between Miriam’s sin and that of the meraglim.
The meraglim were leaders,
prominent and sincere people who apparently set out to do good. They returned
with graphs, maps and demographic details that were factual and accurate. Their
reports regarding the land were correct and were not disputed by Yehoshua and
Kaleiv.
What, then, was the taanah on
them? What did they do wrong? Where did they err? They were given a mission and completed it to
the best of their abilities. Why were they and the entire nation of Klal
Yisroel who accepted their findings punished so severely?
Miriam had spoken to Aharon and
questioned their brother Moshe’s decision to separate from his wife. “Al
odos ha’ishah hakushis asher lokach…ki ishah kushis lokach.” The
conversation continued and they said that Hashem had spoken to Miriam and
Aharon as well and they remained married, so why did Moshe think he was
different? What Miriam said was true. There were no lies in what she said and
no fictitious defamation. So where did she go wrong?
The Torah comments on their
conversation, stating, “Veha’ish Moshe onov me’od mikol ha’adam asher al
p’nei ha’adamah - And the man Moshe was extremely humble, more
than any person on the face of the earth” (Bamidbar 12:3).
Addressing Miriam’s mistake, the Torah
says that the Ribbono Shel Olam himself addressed her, admonishing, “Umadua
lo yereisem ledaber be’avdi beMoshe - Why were you not afraid to speak
about my servant Moshe?” (Bamidbar 12:8).
The complaint against her was not that
she spoke untruths and not that she fabricated a scandal about Moshe, but,
rather, that she lacked the requisite humility, reverence and awe when
discussing the gadol hador, the k’dosh Hashem, the av
hanevi’im.
The monumental mistake of the meraglim
was similar. They spoke in a most cavalier fashion about Eretz
Yisroel, the land whose properties are intangible. The land whose every four amos
carry within them sublime segulos. The land described by the Master of
the World as “flowing with milk and honey.” Sure, it may well be that what they
said was true, but it was the way they reported their findings - without
reverence for the land, without fear of insulting G-d’s paradise, without awe
and respect - that they were held to account for.
The family of Rav Mordechai of
Chernobyl inherited from him a bottle of wine from Eretz Yisroel that a wealthy
chossid had presented him. The bottle was displayed in a place of honor
and treated with reverence because it was blessed with the holiness of the
land. The bottle remained unopened for years, reserved for the right occasion;
one deemed holy and special enough to merit the participation of this treasure.
When the rebbe passed away, he left behind eight sons, each one a rebbe
in his own right. The bottle remained in the family, unopened, waiting for the
proper occasion.
There was a family simcha that
brought the eight rebbes together. Amidst the excitement of the reunion,
it was decided that the time had come to open the bottle from Eretz Yisroel. A shamash
brought it to the table and, with great kavanah, poured some wine
into each brother’s cup. As he was about to empty the bottle into the cup of
the youngest brother, Rav Yochanan of Rachmastrivka, he quietly shook his head
and motioned to the shamash that he didn’t want any of the wine. His
brothers looked on in surprise. They had waited for years to open this bottle
and partake of its spirits. Now, finally, the time had come. Why was he
rejecting the opportunity to partake in the treasure?
The Rachmastrivka Rebbe explained,
“I appreciate wine and I am aware of the quality of the wine I drink. I am
worried that if I sip this wine from Eretz Yisroel and I have a thought,
however brief, that its quality is inferior, I will be guilty of the sin of the
meraglim. One isn’t permitted to think negatively of Eretz Yisroel. I’d
rather forgo the opportunity than be faced with that aveirah.”
The Rachmastrivka Rebbe understood
that when discussing the land, it isn’t about truth or fact, but about
reverence and respect. It is Hashem’s chosen land, and just as one is careful
when speaking about holy people, one has to be cautious when discussing holy
places and things.
In pre-war Baranovitch, there was a
group of Jewish teenagers who had “proudly” thrown off the observance of their
fathers, feeling that the dictates of Shulchan Aruch were too difficult,
irrelevant and not for them.
They formed a social group and began
hosting myriad anti-Torah events, eventually holding a public mixed dance in
the town of Baranovitch. The bnei hayeshiva were offended by their
brazen display of prikas ol. As the dance got underway, some bochurim
arrived at the hall. Standing at the doorway, they protested aloud, dissuading
some participants and causing aggravation for the organizers.
The next day, in the middle of seder,
a large group of secular teenagers burst into the bais medrash as the bochurim
sat learning to exact revenge for disturbing their dance. The youths were
brawny and threatening, walking up and down the aisle of the bais medrash,
clearly looking for a victim. The bochurim were scared that when
they would find the protesters, they would beat them.
The leader rolled up his sleeves when
he identified one of the protesters and approached menacingly. At that moment,
the rosh yeshiva, Rav Elchonon Wasserman, walked into the bais
medrash and positioned his tall frame directly in front of the leader.
With a mocking jeer, the fellow looked
at Rav Elchonon, the gaon and kadosh, mechaber of Kovetz
Shiurim and Kovetz He’aros, and said, “Choneh, nisht mit hent
(not with your hands),” suggesting that the rosh yeshiva was about to
engage in a physical altercation with him.
Rav Elchonon stared at him, not
responding. Eventually, the leader gave up and turned to leave, with the rest
of the young men following behind him. Those in the bais medrash breathed
a sigh of relief.
A few hours later, a harried messenger
rushed in to Rav Elchonon. Breathlessly, the messenger blurted out to the rosh
yeshiva, “The young man, the leader of that group, is unable to move his
arms. Please help him.”
Throughout the day, many others came to
inform the rosh yeshiva that the fellow who had brazenly called out, “Choneh,
nisht mit hent,” was in agony, his hands locked in place.
Rav Elchonon went to visit the young
man and concluded that he had learned his lesson. Rav Elchonon told him that he
was mochel the slight to his honor. Immediately, the young man
experienced relief. As his hands moved and he gained a new respect for the
power of Torah and gedolei Torah; and a new appreciation for the warning
of Chazal in regard to antagonizing talmidei chachomim:
“Hizharu begachaloson shel talmidei chachomim shelo tikaveh - Beware of
their coals, so that you don’t get burned.”
Offending talmidei chachomim is,
literally, playing with fire.
Rav Elchonon Wasserman was asked about
the permissibility of voting for Jewish representatives who have displayed a
hatred for religion. He responded that it is not only forbidden to do so, but
that to do so would be wasting one’s vote.
The most effective measure of a person’s
greatness and suitability to serve in a position of responsibility for the
community is to gauge his humility. The greater the person is, the more humble
he is. The smaller the person, the more he is consumed with self-importance.
In order to be an effective public
servant and really effect change and make a difference, the shliach tzibbur
must put aside his own wishes and needs and practice complete self-negation. If
it becomes all about him, he won’t be able to accomplish anything. To vote for shlichim
whose primary motivation is to benefit themselves and their own agendas is a
total waste. Instead of subjugating themselves to the public, they subjugate
the public to their cause.
The quintessential shliach for
his people was Moshe Rabbeinu, about whom the Torah testifies that he was onov
me’od, free of personal ambition and calculations. Perhaps it was this that
made him the most effective shliach and leader the Jewish people have
ever been blessed with.
Rabbi Moshe Sherer presented a dilemma
before the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah and presented two possible resolutions. He
had spent much time preparing for the meeting and forcefully supported a
certain course of action, making a detailed presentation before the gedolim
and explaining the many reasons he thought they should advocate a certain
position.
The assembled gedolim listened
and then ruled that the other option was better, directing him to follow the
course he had advocated against. He walked out of that meeting and seemed
particularly happy. His assistants were surprised. They expected him to be
upset, as his carefully prepared presentation had just been shot down. One of
them asked him about it and Rabbi Sherer explained: “This is a happy day for
me, because this is the reason we have a Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah. When they
rule in a way that I understand, I’m still working with self-interest, because
I agree. It’s when they overrule my opinions that I work purely to carry out
the will of my meshalchim, those who sent me here.”
He was a most effective shliach
because it wasn’t about him.
In the middle of the parsha of
Miriam, the Torah informs us that Moshe Rabbeinu was “anav me’od mikol odom
asher al p’nei ha’adomah,” the embodiment of humility and modesty. The
mention of Moshe’s anavah seems to be unrelated to what transpired; why
is it here?
The Ramban explains that the
reason the Torah testifies about Moshe Rabbeinu’s humility after relating what
Miriam had done is “lehagid ki Hashem kinei lo ba’avur anvasanuso.” Knowing
that Moshe wouldn’t speak up in his own defense, Hakadosh Boruch Hu
defended him.
As we read Parshas Shelach
this year, we are under assault from many individuals who openly denigrate and
disagree with our gedolim and our way of life. With smug smirks of
hubris, they speak and write cunningly, alleging that they come to help us,
offering statistics and studies to support their plans of change. With
unabashed demagoguery, they malign the entire community of Torah observers,
painting us all as dishonest, unschooled leeches, parasites and abusers. They
freely smash laymen, talmidei chachomim, rabbonim, roshei yeshiva and gedolim.
Anybody who displays fidelity to the traditional way of life is fair game for
mockery and in need of their remedial assistance.
The arrogant, patronizing haters would
be well advised to step back for a moment of humble contemplation. Yes, there
are issues that need to be addressed, but how dare they attack the Torah, its
leaders and its followers with wide smiles on their faces. How do they
pontificate in all varieties of media, promoting their own political futures by
bashing shomrei Torah umitzvos? How are the religious among them not
embarrassed to stand alongside scoffers as they lampoon gedolim as being
parochial, provincial, out of touch confused old men?
We say to them, “Madua lo yireisem
ledabeir be’avdi beMoshe?”
How dare those small people and their
followers mock luminaries whose Torah lights up the world, such as Rav Aharon
Leib Shteinman, a man divested of the pleasures of this world who spent decades
far from the public eye toiling in learning.
Who do they think they are to poke fun
of Chacham Ovadia Yosef, whose enduring image is one of him hunched over a sefer,
whose joy in life comes purely from Torascha sha’ashuai, a prince among
his people who spent decades learning mitoch had’chak until all of the
Torah was subsumed in his being.
How can anyone not fear ridiculing Rav
Chaim Kanievsky, who has inhabited the four amos of halacha since
he was a child, son of the holy Steipler, raised on the Chazon Ish’s knee,
a man who is famously familiar with kol haTorah kulah, who lives for the
Torah and the klal, and whose brachos and advice are sought after
by tens of thousands of Yidden.
Those who consider it prudent to
challenge this caliber of person in the pursuit of personal agendas of
so-called “equality of burden” would do well to heed the words of the Ramban:
“lehagid ki Hashem kinei lo ba’avur anvasanuso.”
Madua,
we wonder, lo yireisem to deride avdi Rav Aharon Leib, avdi
Chacham Ovadia, avdi Rav Chaim, and the other gedolim whose
teachings and rulings you disrespectfully scorn. Haven’t you learned the
lessons of the history you claim to cherish?
All through the ages, we have suffered
from small people who have attempted to aggrandize themselves at the expense of
lomdei and shomrei Torah. Throughout our history, we have been
victimized by small people who have sought to ingratiate themselves with the
governing powers by vilifying Torah observers. They rose and then they fell,
forgotten, eventually banished to the ash heap of history.
When Israel’s first Prime Minister
David Ben Gurion established the state he needed to have all of Israel’s Jews
on board with the proposal. He promised the religious community that their
interests would be protected with a status quo arrangement pertaining to all
matters of religion and the draft in the state. Ever since that agreement, our
community’s enemies, seeking our demise, meet, plot, speak, vote, legislate and
pontificate, but it is all for naught.
To no avail, our secularist foes have
tried to accomplish their goals with laws, imprisonment, punitive financial
edicts, and a double standard in governmental support and legislation. And now
they are back at it, once again with the assistance of religious parties,
representatives and leaders.
They would do well to remember the
mistakes of those who, armed with facts and figures, lost their reverence and
respect for our most important institutions.
They
should learn the lesson of this week’s parsha and ponder the fate of
those who spoke against the land that Hakadosh Boruch Hu chose, and the
people He has marked with greatness and nobility.