Servitude of Love
Sukkos is a Yom Tov of complete joy. We expend so much
effort in finding proper Dalet Minim and in building and decorating our sukkos.
When the sun goes down on the fourteenth day of Tishrei, happiness
descends upon the Jewish people wherever they are. There are few things that
can dampen the enthusiasm that takes over young and old alike. The first would
be something affecting the kashrus of your much sought-after esrog.
However, even more disheartening than
the loss of a pitum is the experience of sitting down in a beautifully
decorated sukkah, paper-chains of blue and yellow and green
crisscrossing its expanse, beautiful pictures decorating the walls, the table
laid out with a crisp white tablecloth and the finest dishes, everyone dressed
in their Yom Tov finest, the refraction of the lights and candles
reflecting off the glowing faces of everyone seated around the table; and then
the sky opens up above your s’chach drenching everyone with pouring
rain.
Rain on Sukkos is distressing
for a deeper reason than ruined soup and sukkah decorations. There is a
Divine message inherent in the driving downpour. The Mishnah in Sukkah
(28) famously tells us that rain on Sukkos is compared to a servant who
comes to pour a drink for his master, and instead of accepting the cup, the
master throws the drink back in the servant’s face.
How dispiriting it is to have an act of
devotion and deference rejected in such fashion.
Why does the Mishnah bring out
its point of the bad omen of rain on Sukkos through an allegory
describing a slave and his master? The Mishnah could have made the same
point utilizing an allegorical tale involving a son serving his father, rather
than a slave and his master.
A person’s children are his children no
matter what happens. Nothing can change that. If a son is disobedient, he still
remains a son. If a son doesn’t serve his parents properly, he is still their
son. They may be upset with him, and they will try to educate him to improve
his ways and manners, but they cannot divorce him from being their son.
Servants and slaves, however, exist
purely to serve their masters. The concept of avdus is one of complete
and utter servitude. Their very existence is dependent upon their masters’
mercy. Should the eved not serve his master properly, he won’t remain an
eved much longer.
When a master rejects his servant’s
help, the master isn’t merely rebuffing or insulting him. The master is
rejecting his very essence. The master, in a statement of total invalidation,
is declaring that he has no need for the servant.
Our relationship with Hashem is one of
duality. We are both children and avodim. On Rosh Hashanah,
following the shofar blasts of Malchiyos, Zichronos and Shofros,
we recite a brief tefillah. We proclaim that we are bonim and avodim.
We ask Hashem that if He perceives us as children, he should have mercy on us
the way a father has mercy on his children. If He is dealing with us as avodim,
we ask that we find favor in His eyes so that we will emerge triumphant upon
being judged.
If that is the case, why, when it comes
to Sukkos, is our relationship with Hashem depicted as one of avodim,
and not as bonim, children?
Perhaps we can understand this by
examining the biblical explanation for the mitzvah of sukkah.
Hashem commands us to sit in the sukkah,
stating, “Lemaan yeidu doroseichem ki basukkos hoshavti es Bnei Yisroel
behotzi’i osom mei’eretz Mitzrayim - So that your future generations will know
that I placed the Jewish people in sukkos when I took them out of Mitzrayim.”
The mitzvah of sukkah is
to remind us that Hashem redeemed us from slavery in Mitzrayim. When we sit in
the sukkah, we proclaim that Hashem plucked us out of that awful
situation and fashioned us to be his avodim. As Chazal say, “Avodei
heim, velo avodim la’avodim.” We are avdei Hashem, not avodim
to people who are themselves avodim.
Because we are His avodim, He
freed us from the Mitzri physical servitude, split the Yam Suf for us,
and put us on safe, dry land, where he built sukkos for us and spread
his canopy of peace over us. The supreme joy of Sukkos is a celebration
of our rewarding avdus of Hashem.
Therefore, since the Yom Tov of Sukkos
is a celebration of our becoming exclusively avdei Hashem, when
it rains on us in our sukkos, it is as if there is a Heavenly
proclamation that our service is not appreciated. The avodah of Sukkos
is avdus. It is a celebration of avdus. When there is a taanoh
on us, it is a taanoh on our bechinah of avdus. Therefore,
the Mishnah uses the moshol of an eved and his master to
portray the calamity of Sukkos rain.
This might be the rationale behind the din
of mitzta’er, which is unique in the performance of mitzvos. One
who is pained by sitting in the sukkah is freed of his obligation to sit
there. Our approach to this mitzvah is that of avodim. A servant
doesn’t have the luxury of feeling inconvenienced. If a servant is unhappy and
pained by what he has to do, he has failed in his role and is not properly
cognizant of his function. A servant does as he is commanded. His job is to
perform for his master and be there at his beck and call. If he cannot do that,
he is a failure.
An eved Hashem who feels
that he is inconvenienced by the mitzvos has lost focus. A person who is
pained to fulfill the will of Hashem has failed in his avodah. Hashem
says to him, “I don’t need you here. You may leave.”
Now we can understand as well why one
who sits in the sukkah as rain is falling is termed a hedyot by
Chazal. An eved whose services are not wanted must atone for his wrong
doing and find favor again in the eyes of his master before returning to his
service. As long as his master is displeased with him, he must stay away. Rain
on Sukkos is a message to us that we must work harder to find favor in
the eyes of Hashem. One who ignores that message is a hedyot. The proper
response is sadness at being turned out and engaging in teshuvah in
order to be welcomed back in the tzeila d’miheimnusa.
Rain on Sukkos, as well, forces
us to reexamine our identity, as our very role as avdei Hashem is
threatened.
On Rosh Hashanah, we called upon
our status as avodim. Each time we blew the shofar, we
asked Hakadosh Boruch Hu to have mercy on us, whether as sons or as
servants. We are indeed both. We possess the fierce love and devotion of a son,
coupled with the loyalty and dependability of an eved.
The avodah of the Yomim
Noraim is to work on ourselves to be more subservient to the will of Hashem
and be mamlich Him over us. With much longing, we say, “Veyomar kol
asher neshomah be’apo, Hashem Elokei Yisroel Melech.” For ten days, we
proclaim that Hashem is the “Melech Hakadosh.” We recite pesukim
of Malchiyos and pray that “veyekablu ohl malchuscha aleihem.”
The point of all these tefillos
and others similar to them is for us to recognize our duty as avodim to
Hashem. We approach Sukkos confident in having surmounted that challenge
and perfected our avdus. Therefore, when it rains, it is a sign that our
avdus leaves much to be desired and we have not yet perfected ourselves
as required.
Yetzias Mitzrayim was a march to a new reality. Once we tasted the bitter
taste of servitude to the Mitzriyim, we were led out toward Har Sinai,
where we were charged with the mandate of avdus Hashem.
Rosh Hashanah tells us of Hashem’s greatness, and once we internalize
that, we realize how lowly we are. Yom Kippur brings us to true humility
and shiflus. Broken and contrite, we are then ready for Sukkos,
humble servants eager to serve their Master.
The excitement we feel about sitting in
the sukkah is exhilaration about facing our destiny. In its embrace, we
celebrate avdus.
Rav Shmuel Yosef Fishbane, rov of
White Lake, NY, has a rich collection of stories about the people he has met
over decades of reaching out to Yidden. He tells a story from the sad
period in this country when Torah Jews found themselves jobless each
Monday due to their refusal to work on Shabbos.
There was one person who would receive
his notice of dismissal every week after having failed to show up for work on Shabbos.
Each week, this Yid would take the piece of paper terminating his
employment and place it in a box he kept under his bed. It was a curious minhag,
which perplexed his family. The papers added up, and before long, he had a
large collection of “pink slips.”
When Sukkos came, the man put up
a small sukkah. Then he went to his room and pulled out the box. He
proceeded to his sukkah and hung up the little papers all over its
walls, testimony to his resolve and commitment to his avdus.
“These,” the man told his family, “are
my sukkah decorations.”
Avodim like this man are filled with simcha, growth and a
proper understanding of roles, despite the challenges life throws their way.
Perhaps we can understand the Mishnah
and its moshol on a deeper level. Following the confrontation that took
place between Yaakov Avinu and Eisov over the brachos of their father
Yitzchok, Yaakov emerged victorious, but he had to run away to escape Eisov’s
wrath. Upon his return, he was confronted by the malach of Eisov.
The malach wished to leave, but
Yaakov wouldn’t let him go. As the posuk (Bereishis 32:27) says, “Lo
ashaleichacha ki im beirachtoni - I will not send you off until you
bless me.” Rashi explains the word beirachtoni to mean,
“Eisov says I stole the brachos from him. Admit to me that the brachos
of my father Yitzchok are rightfully mine.”
The malach answered Yaakov’s
demand, saying, “From now on, your name will not be Yaakov. It will be
Yisroel.”
How did the malach answer
Yaakov’s demand?
Perhaps we can explain this based upon
the statement of the Sefer Hachinuch (Mitzvah 510) that both
Yitzchok Avinu and Avrohom Avinu were named Yisroel. We can understand that the
malach of Eisov was telling Yaakov that he was the one who was entitled
to carry on the name of the avos, just as his father and grandfather had
done. The malach was admitting that Yaakov was the one who would bear
their legacy and transmit it to future generations, and through him, the nation
of Klal Yisroel would be formed. Thus, it was natural that the brachos
would belong to Yaakov as well.
Many Rosh Hashanah machzorim
feature a fascinating piece of the Zohar prior to the tekios.
While we generally assume that the incident with Yaakov and Eisov receiving the
brachos from Yitzchok took place just once during their lifetimes, the Zohar
states that it is an eternal battle that takes place annually on Rosh
Hashanah.
Yitzchok, in the middas hadin,
asks Eisov to bring him matamim. Rivkah warns her beloved son Yaakov.
After preparing himself with tefillos and shofar, Yaakov approaches
his father. Yaakov and Rivkah influence Yitzchok, who blesses Yaakov and
reverts to middas horachamim. Joyfully, Yaakov leaves. Eisov then
arrives with implements of Olam Hazeh to beat back Yaakov, but it is for
naught. Yaakov davens, repents and fasts, and, finally, emerges
victorious. Hashem wants to celebrate with His children. Yaakov builds a sukkah
and is saved from the mekatreig. Hashem is then happy with His
children.
The Medrash (Vayikra Rabbah
30:2) writes of a similar idea and states that the Jews and the nations of the
world argue their case in front of Hashem on Rosh Hashanah. We don’t
know who won until the Jews go out on Sukkos with their lulavim
and esrogim. Then we are assured that the Jews have won and have once
again overcome those who seek their destruction.
The Netziv, in his peirush
Hamek Dovor (Vayikra 16:29), explains that in the debate regarding
the survival of the Jewish people, essentially, according to teva, the
Jews should lose. It is only because Hashem watches over us in the merit of our
Torah, avodah and gemillus chassodim that we survive and are
granted a new year. However, if you would add up the numbers and figure it all
out with pen and paper according to the laws of nature and human understanding,
there would be no way that the Jews would be able to defeat all those who seek
their destruction.
With this, perhaps we can understand
why the Mishnah compares Am Yisroel to an eved in the moshol
depicting rain falling on the night of Sukkos. We have just endured
the annual battle between Yaakov and Eisov, between the Bnei Yisroel and
the umos ha’olam, between teva and Torah, avodah and
gemillus chassodim. Klal Yisroel wins because it is lema’ala
miderech hateva. It is not beholden to teva and the laws of nature.
Thus, when rain falls and prevents Am
Yisroel from observing the mitzvah of sukkah, it is an omen
that the teva may be dominant over Torah during the coming year and,
therefore, it is indicative of calamity.
Yaakov was given the name Yisroel and
the mantle of the avos to memorialize that he builds a sukkah
where he celebrates his victory and brochah. But if rain prevents us
from entering our sukkos, we fear that it is a message from Heaven that
we are not worthy of being the Chosen Nation and bearers of that royal
heritage, and, by consequence, treated specially because we are bonim
laMakom. Thus, the Mishnah compares us to avodim, not bonim.
This year, clouds of fear surround us
domestically, in Europe, and, most prominently, in Eretz Yisroel. The enemies
of the Jews fought very hard this past Rosh Hashanah, as they do every
year, for the right to destroy us. We believe that the koach of our
Torah, avodah and gemillus chassodim, coupled with our teshuvah,
tefillah and tzedakah, were ma’avir the ro’a hagezeirah,
and we were chosen once again by Hashem.
The Bais Yisroel of Ger
commented on the chasdei Hashem of the timing of the Yom Kippur War.
“This was a dangerous war,” the Rebbe
said, “which, al pi teva, Israel should have lost. So Hakadosh Boruch
Hu, in His great mercy, arranged for it to break out on the day when our zechuyos
are strong and when our nation’s merits shine brightly. Thus, much of the
damage was averted. Had it broken out any other day, the results would have
been much worse, Rachmona litzlon.”
While according to the laws of teva we
are too small to fight back and defend ourselves, affect elections, bomb
bunkers and change world opinion, we know that Hakadosh Boruch Hu stands
by us. Thus, as our grandfather Yaakov did, we build sukkos to celebrate
our victory together with Hashem.
We pray that we will be seen as worthy
heirs to the name Yisroel and treated as Hashem’s children and not as slaves,
who are only around as long as their services are desired.
We pray that we will be treated as
children, and even if we err and stray, we will always be welcomed back and
never abandoned. We pray that this time, our zechuyos will be strong
enough to drive away the enemy before he even has a chance to make a move. And,
finally, we pray that we merit to sit b’sukkas oro shel livyoson very
soon.
Rav Berel Soloveitchik would sit in his
sukkah on Rechov Menachem in Yerushalayim and tell of the harrowing
experiences of the Sukkos he spent with his father, the Brisker Rov, in
Warsaw in 1940.
The Poles had lost town after town to
the German Nazis, but decided to make a last stand in their capital city,
Warsaw. Determined to beat the hapless Poles into submission, the Germans
engaged in brutal daily aerial bombardments of the city. Death was a common
occurrence. Streets were filled with all sorts of debris from the toppled
buildings. There was smoke and fire everywhere. Hunger and deprivation were
daily portions served up with good doses of fear and worry about what the next
day would bring.
Part of the building where the Brisker
Rov was staying was destroyed in a bombing right before Sukkos. The rov
noticed that a man who was sharing the place with them was despondent. He
attempted to console the person, speaking softly and offering words of hope
about their dire situation. The man looked at him and said, “Rebbe, that is not
why I am sad.” It wasn’t their precarious physical situation that had him down.
“It’s Erev Sukkos and I don’t have Dalet Minim to make a brochah
on.”
The rov told him not to worry.
He had received a message that the Lubavitcher Rebbe had an esrog for
him on the other side of town. A Gerrer bochur volunteered to make the
long, dangerous trek to retrieve it. The rov reassured the man that he
would be able to be mekayeim the mitzvah.
The first morning of Sukkos, the
Brisker Rov was awoken early. It was still dark and there was noise outside. It
sounded like people were gathering outside his window. He feared that something
was very wrong, but he soon found out otherwise.
In the entire Warsaw, there were only
four sets of Dalet Minim. The person the rov had encountered had
told people that Dalet Minim would be available by the Brisker Rov. Word
spread like wildfire, and tayereh Yidden, who were suffering from all
types of depravation and who feared for their lives, braved the curfew and woke
early to be able to make a brochah on the Dalet Minim. A long
line was forming.
The entire day, avdei Hashem streamed
to that shattered building and stood on line for the zechus to be mekayeim
the treasured mitzvah.
“Despite all that was going on and all
they had been through,” the rov would recount years later in
Yerushalayim, “there was a line of Yidden waiting to shake my Dalet
Minim, like from here (his apartment on Rechov Press) to the Zichron Moshe shul.
And then,” finished the rov emphatically, “we saw what Yidden really
are!”
Four beautiful minim, together
reflecting the splendor of a nation. Pri eitz hadar, for the am hadar,
avodim and bonim of the Melech Malchei Hamelochim cognizant
of their roles and overjoyed to fulfill them no matter what goes on around
them, in Warsaw in 1940, and wherever we are today.
May we all merit a bright and sunny Sukkos,
full of avdus, simcha and kedushah.
Ah
gutten Yom Tov.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home